Search for: All records

Abstract By comparing Cepheid brightnesses with geometric distance measures including Gaia EDR3 parallaxes, most recent analyses conclude metal-rich Cepheids are brighter, quantified asγ∼ −0.2 mag dex⁻¹. While the value ofγhas little impact on the determination of the Hubble constant in contemporary distance ladders (due to the similarity of metallicity across these ladders),γplays a role in gauging the distances to metal-poor dwarf galaxies like the Magellanic Clouds and is of considerable interest in testing stellar models. Recently, B. F. Madore & W. L. Freedman (hereafter MF25) recalibrated Gaia EDR3 parallaxes by adding to them a magnitude offset to match certain historic Cepheid parallaxes, which otherwise differ by ∼1.6σ. A calibration that adjusts Gaia parallaxes by applying a magnitude offset (i.e., a multiplicative correction in parallax) differs significantly from the Gaia Team’s calibration, which is additive in parallax space—especially at distances much closer than 1 kpc or beyond 10 kpc, outside the ∼2–3 kpc range on which the MF25 calibration was based. The MF25 approach reducesγto zero. If broadly applied, it places nearby cluster distances like the Pleiades too close compared to independent measurements, while leaving distant quasars with negative parallaxes. We conclude that the MF25 proposal for Gaia calibration andγ∼ 0 produces farther-reaching consequences, many of which are strongly disfavored by the data.